Comments on: Can someone be held liable for child support as a legal guardian even if there is a negative paternaty test?

By: Drixnot

Drixnot — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:09:59 +0000

I doubt that its true, otherwise we would see that kind of thing happening more often with wealthy men…. just pick Dr. so-and-so’s name out of the local phone book and rake in the dough.

By: little78lucky

little78lucky — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:09:59 +0000

yup that could happen

By: bullwinkle

bullwinkle — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:09:59 +0000

1st Q: yes Last Q:Probably not.

By: Spock (rhp)

Spock (rhp) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:09:59 +0000

yes, it could happen.

and it could be even worse — the guy could have been overseas in service or in prison at the critical time and still be served by publication in the paper "back home". The court doesn’t inquire why you don’t show, they simply rule against you if you don’t and are known to have recently lived in the jurisdiction.

if there’s no one in the area who told you, you’d be found liable.

Now, can you reverse the decision years later by showing in court that you didn’t know and weren’t the actual parent?

good question — might be, in some states, you’d be stuck for life.

By: Brian C

Brian C — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:09:59 +0000

I have heard stories like this several times. Nothing surprises me anymore. If the fellow in question has tens of thousands to spend on an attorney, he could start fighting and making the attorney more wealthy. Here in the state where I live, if one gets behind on CS payments, he or she is unconstitutionally put into debtor’s prison as a slave.

Nothing like being an indentured servant to a woman who takes your child hostage. Welcome to the US legal system. Fu*k the politician lawyers who write this crap. Same to the women, judges and everyone else who participates in this type of disgusting perversion of justice.